Ви переглядаєте архівну версію офіційного сайту НУЛП (2005-2020р.р.). Актуальна версія: https://lpnu.ua

Basics of Monument Studies (курсова робота)

Major: Museum and monument studies
Code of Subject: 6.027.00.O.48
Credits: 2
Department: History of Ukraine and Ethnic Communication
Lecturer: PhD Melnyk Roman
Semester: 6 семестр
Mode of Study: денна
Learning outcomes:
Understand trends study monuments of culture in terms of the concept of sustainable development
• Classify monuments as one of the tasks of history, which provides research and study of historical monuments.
• Know especially the use of the term "monuments" to describe the scope of scientific knowledge;
• Understand the concept of "attraction";
• To classify the historical and cultural values;
• Know the areas of social and cultural monuments;
• Find out pam'yatkoznavchymy links between disciplines and to determine their subject-object areas
Required prior and related subjects:
• History and Culture of Europe.
• History and Culture of Ukraine.
• Fundamentals of excursions.
• Fundamentals of cultural heritage preservation.
Summary of the subject:
1. The origin of monumental activity. 2. The concept of historical monument of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Discussion on the content of the monument of old. 3. Activities of state institutions and public organizations 4. Problems in the implementation of monumental and conservation work in Ukraine. 5. The first information of the nineteenth-century monumental nature (historical and statistical descriptions, essays, journals, etc.). 6. The role of public heritage institutions and societies in the field research and preservation of cultural heritage: 7. The origin of the local excursion. 8. M. Ivanishev's Expedition in 1852 9. The first explorers of archaeographic and historical sites in the city. 10. Activities of the Volyn Provincial Statistical Committee the area of ??conservation. 11. Formation and directions of the Society of Antiquities Researchers. 12. Role of the UNGU Historical Commissions in the Development of the Ukrainian monuments in the 1920s-1930s. 13. Main directions of the monumental activity of public associations and societies before the Second World War. 14. Monuments and monuments in the Western Ukrainian lands during the interwar period. 15. The fate of Ukrainian historical and cultural heritage during the Second World War War. 16. Activities of Ukrainian conservation agencies and public bodies history and culture conservation organizations (1990s - beginning of the 21st century): 17. Problems of monumental work and preservation of cultural heritage in independent Ukraine. 18. Prospects for the development of Ukrainian monumental science.
Recommended Books:
Руденко С.Б. Про фундаментальні засади пам’яткознавства / С. Б. Руденко // Праці Центру пам’яткознавства. – 2008. – Вип. 14. – С. 18 – 40.
Кот С.І. Теоретичні проблеми пам’яткознавства / С. І. Кот // Пам’яткознавчі студії в Україні: теорія і практика. – К., 2007. – С. 4 – 64.
Заремба С.З. Нариси з історії українського пам’яткознавства / С. З. Заремба. – К.: Аратта, 2002. – 204 с.
В.О. Константинов; Центр пам’яткознавства НАН України та УТОПіК. – Ніжин, 2008. – 172 с.
Гріффен Л.О. Пам’ятка техніки як феномен історії і культури / Л.О.Гріффен // Праці Центру пам’яткознавства. – 20008. – Вип. 14. – С. 40 – 52.
Руденко С.Б. Формування системи наукових знань про матеріальну історико-культурну пам’ятку як соціокультурний феномен (сер. 80-х рр. ХХ ст. – початок ХХІ ст.) / С. Б. Руденко // Актуальні питання історії науки і техніки: матеріали 8-oї Всеукр. наук. конф. м. Очаків, 17 – 19 жовтня 2009 р. – К., 2009. – С. 254 – 256
Assessment methods and criteria:
The quality of completed and protected coursework is estimated by a number of indicators:
relevance, novelty of the chosen topic and the practical value of the results obtained;
clarity of structure and logical sequence of material presentation;
presence of controversial and polemical material, reasoning and accuracy of the given data;
the quality and depth of the scientific, theoretical, methodological and practical analysis of the problem;
the content of the student's report on the main results of the research during the defense;
the systematic and systematic nature of the student's work on the topic;
correctness of coursework and timeliness of its delivery.
Coursework is evaluated on a 4-point scale, namely:
"Perfectly". Coursework completed on a high scientific level; contains elements of scientific novelty; has practical value; the report is logical and brief, proclaimed freely.
"Fine". The theme of work is revealed, but there are disadvantages of a non-fundamental nature: in the theoretical part, literary sources are analyzed superficially; elements of novelty and practical value are not clearly presented; the report is logical, proclaimed freely; work is executed within the established requirements.
"Satisfactorily". The theme of the work, basically, is revealed, but there are shortcomings of the content nature: the unclear formulation of the purpose of the study; there is no analysis of scientific polemics; in the analytical part there is an excess of the elements of the narrative; the selection of information materials (tables, diagrams) is not always justified, there is no generalization of the results obtained; low practical significance of work; there is a note regarding the job design.
"Unsatisfactorily". Unclear formulation of the purpose of the study. There is no logical connection between sections of work; review of modern literary sources carried out without analysis and generalization; the descriptiveness of individual scientific facts prevails. There are significant shortcomings in the design of work.